Fundamental Rights
~12 min read
- Six Rights: Equality (14-18), Freedom (19-22), Against Exploitation (23-24), Religion (25-28), Cultural/Educational (29-30), Constitutional Remedies (32). Right to Property removed by 44th Am., 1978.
- Article 32: The 'soul' of the Constitution — Ambedkar's words. Right to move SC for enforcement.
- Suspension: Most rights can be suspended during emergency; Article 20 (protection from criminal law) and Article 21 (life & personal liberty) cannot be.
Fundamental Rights are the citizen's defence against arbitrary state action. Originally seven, now six. Articles 12-35 in Part III. NDA tests each right's article, key cases, and the doctrine of constitutional remedies.
The Six Rights
| Right | Articles | Highlights |
|---|---|---|
| Right to Equality | 14-18 | 14 (before law), 15 (no discrimination), 16 (equal public employment), 17 (abolition of untouchability), 18 (abolition of titles) |
| Right to Freedom | 19-22 | 19 (six freedoms — speech, assembly, association, movement, residence, profession), 20 (protection in criminal law), 21 (life & personal liberty), 21A (education 6-14, added 86th Am.), 22 (arrest) |
| Right against Exploitation | 23-24 | 23 (no human trafficking, forced labour), 24 (no child labour below 14 in factories/mines) |
| Right to Freedom of Religion | 25-28 | 25 (freedom of conscience), 26 (manage religious affairs), 27 (no tax for religion), 28 (no religious instruction in state schools) |
| Cultural & Educational Rights | 29-30 | 29 (protection of language/script/culture of minorities), 30 (minorities' right to administer educational institutions) |
| Right to Constitutional Remedies | 32 | Right to approach SC directly for enforcement of FRs — Ambedkar called it the 'heart and soul' of the Constitution |
Article 14 and the Equality Code
Article 14: "The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India."
Two limbs:
- Equality before law (British concept) — no person is above the law; all are equally subject to ordinary law.
- Equal protection of laws (American concept) — like must be treated alike; reasonable classification allowed.
Test for valid classification (E.P. Royappa, Maneka Gandhi):
- Classification must be based on intelligible differentia.
- The differentia must have a rational nexus with the object of the law.
Article 21 — Right to Life and Liberty
"No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law."
Originally interpreted narrowly (A.K. Gopalan, 1950). Maneka Gandhi v. UoI (1978) gave Article 21 a wide reading — the "procedure" must be fair, just, and reasonable, not merely any procedure.
Rights read into Article 21 over time:
- Right to privacy (K.S. Puttaswamy, 2017 — 9-judge bench)
- Right to live with dignity
- Right to clean environment
- Right to livelihood
- Right to education (later codified in Article 21A by 86th Am.)
- Right to legal aid
- Right to speedy trial
- Right to die with dignity (passive euthanasia, Common Cause case 2018)
- Right to internet access (Anuradha Bhasin case)
Article 32 — Right to Constitutional Remedies
Article 32 allows any person to move the Supreme Court for enforcement of a Fundamental Right. SC can issue five writs:
- Habeas Corpus — produce the body; against illegal detention.
- Mandamus — command to perform a public duty.
- Prohibition — stop a lower court from exceeding jurisdiction.
- Certiorari — quash an order of a lower court that exceeded its jurisdiction.
- Quo Warranto — by what authority does a person hold public office?
High Courts have similar power under Article 226 — but with wider scope (can issue writs for "any other purpose", not just FR enforcement).
Landmark Cases
| Case | Year | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Shankari Prasad v. UoI | 1951 | Parliament can amend FRs (later overturned) |
| Golak Nath v. State of Punjab | 1967 | FRs cannot be amended by Parliament (later overturned by Kesavananda) |
| Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala | 1973 | Parliament can amend any part including FRs, but not basic structure |
| Maneka Gandhi v. UoI | 1978 | Expanded Article 21 — procedure must be fair, just, reasonable; passport law tested |
| Minerva Mills v. UoI | 1980 | Limited 42nd Amendment; reaffirmed basic structure doctrine |
| K.S. Puttaswamy v. UoI | 2017 | Right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 (9-judge bench) |
| Navtej Singh Johar v. UoI | 2018 | Decriminalised consensual same-sex relations (Section 377 read down) |
NDA PYQ Examples
Q: The right to constitutional remedies is enshrined in:
(a) Article 12 (b) Article 21 (c) Article 32 (d) Article 226
Answer: (c) Article 32 — called the 'heart and soul' of the Constitution by Ambedkar.
Q: Right to property was removed from Fundamental Rights by which amendment?
(a) 42nd (b) 44th (c) 73rd (d) 86th
Answer: (b) 44th Amendment, 1978 — moved to Article 300A as a legal right.
Q: Article 21A (Right to Education) was added by:
(a) 73rd Amendment (b) 86th Amendment (c) 93rd Amendment (d) 101st Amendment
Answer: (b) 86th Amendment, 2002 — RTE for children 6-14.
Q: Untouchability is abolished by:
(a) Article 14 (b) Article 15 (c) Article 17 (d) Article 18
Answer: (c) Article 17.
Drill Fundamental Rights for NDA
NDA-pattern items on Fundamental Rights with answer keys and explanations.
Start Free Mock TestFrequently Asked Questions
How many Fundamental Rights are there now?
Six. Originally seven; Right to Property removed by the 44th Amendment (1978) and made a legal right under Article 300A.
Are Fundamental Rights absolute?
No — all rights are subject to 'reasonable restrictions' specified within the relevant article. Article 19 freedoms can be restricted in interests of sovereignty, public order, decency, morality, contempt of court, defamation, incitement to offence.
Can Fundamental Rights be suspended during emergency?
Most can — except Articles 20 (protection in criminal cases) and 21 (life and personal liberty). This was clarified by 44th Amendment after the 1975-77 emergency excesses.
What is the difference between Article 32 and Article 226?
Both allow writs. Article 32 — right to approach SC, only for enforcement of FRs, is itself a FR. Article 226 — right to approach HC, for enforcement of FRs and 'any other purpose', is broader but not a FR itself.
Which case expanded Right to Life dramatically?
Maneka Gandhi v. UoI (1978). Before this, 'procedure established by law' meant any law. After, the SC said it must be a fair, just and reasonable procedure — opening Article 21 to wide interpretation.